Urbenville vs Wentworth
Property investment comparison - Urbenville, NSW 2475 vs Wentworth, NSW 2648
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Urbenville wins 0, Wentworth wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Urbenville | Wentworth |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $410K | $410K |
| Median unit price | $255K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.35% | 5.49% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.38% | 6.46% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| Population | 331 | 1,577 |
Urbenville vs Wentworth: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $410K in Urbenville and $410K in Wentworth.
On cash flow, Wentworth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.49%, compared with 3.35% in Urbenville, a gap of 2.14 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Wentworth and 1.9% in Urbenville, so landlords in Wentworth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wentworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,577 against 331, roughly 4.8 times the size of Urbenville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wentworth for rental income, Wentworth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison