Varroville vs Whalan
Property investment comparison - Varroville, NSW 2566 vs Whalan, NSW 2770
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Varroville wins 2, Whalan wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Varroville | Whalan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $930K | $930K |
| Median unit price | $660K | $465K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.62% | 3.02% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.84% | 4.95% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +34.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Population | 134 | 5,929 |
Varroville vs Whalan: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $930K in Varroville and $930K in Whalan.
For units, Varroville sits at a median of $660K against $465K in Whalan, which makes Whalan the more affordable unit market and Varroville the pricier one.
On cash flow, Varroville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.62%, compared with 3.02% in Whalan, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.1%.
Whalan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,929 against 134, roughly 44 times the size of Varroville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Varroville for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison