Skip to main content

Warner vs Woombye

Property investment comparison - Warner, QLD 4500 vs Woombye, QLD 4559

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Warner wins 2, Woombye wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricWarnerWoombye
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$730K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.73%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.81%
1-year house growth+18.1%+13.8%
3-year house growth+46.9%+37.5%
Vacancy rate0.7%0.5%
Population12,2643,944

Warner vs Woombye: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Warner and $1.1M in Woombye.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.1% in Warner and +13.8% in Woombye, so recent momentum favours Warner, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Warner houses are +46.9% and Woombye houses +37.5%, so Warner has compounded faster than Woombye over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Woombye and 0.7% in Warner, so landlords in Woombye face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Warner is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,264 against 3,944, roughly 3.1 times the size of Woombye; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Warner for recent price momentum, Woombye for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison