Welby vs West Wallsend
Property investment comparison - Welby, NSW 2575 vs West Wallsend, NSW 2286
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Welby wins 2, West Wallsend wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Welby | West Wallsend |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $850K | $850K |
| Median unit price | - | $600K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.77% | 2.97% |
| 1-year house growth | +5.5% | +4.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +7.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Population | 764 | 2,981 |
Welby vs West Wallsend: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Welby and $850K in West Wallsend.
Over the past year house prices moved +5.5% in Welby and +4.6% in West Wallsend (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Welby, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Welby and 1.5% in West Wallsend, so landlords in Welby face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
West Wallsend is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,981 against 764, roughly 3.9 times the size of Welby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Welby for recent price momentum, Welby for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison