Wentworth vs Woodenbong
Property investment comparison - Wentworth, NSW 2648 vs Woodenbong, NSW 2476
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Wentworth wins 2, Woodenbong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Wentworth | Woodenbong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $410K | $415K |
| Median unit price | - | $155K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.49% | 4.66% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.46% | 6.71% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.4%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Population | 1,577 | 390 |
Wentworth vs Woodenbong: what the numbers say
The median house price is $410K in Wentworth and $415K in Woodenbong, so Wentworth is the cheaper entry point, with Woodenbong houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Wentworth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.49%, compared with 4.66% in Woodenbong, a gap of 0.83 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.8%.
Wentworth is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,577 against 390, roughly 4.0 times the size of Woodenbong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wentworth for rental income, Wentworth for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison