Skip to main content

Wonnerup vs Yokine

Property investment comparison - Wonnerup, WA 6280 vs Yokine, WA 6060

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Wonnerup wins 3, Yokine wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricWonnerupYokine
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$230K$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%3.34%
Gross rental yield (units)7.59%4.96%
1-year house growth--
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%1.0%
Population19612,706

Wonnerup vs Yokine: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Wonnerup and $1.3M in Yokine, so Yokine is the cheaper entry point, with Wonnerup houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Wonnerup sits at a median of $230K against $720K in Yokine, which makes Wonnerup the more affordable unit market and Yokine the pricier one.

On cash flow, Yokine leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.34%, compared with 3.00% in Wonnerup, a gap of 0.34 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Wonnerup and 1.0% in Yokine, so landlords in Wonnerup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yokine is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,706 against 196, roughly 65 times the size of Wonnerup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yokine for rental income, Yokine for a lower purchase price, Wonnerup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison