Skip to main content

Abbotsford vs Brunswick

Property investment comparison - Abbotsford, VIC 3067 vs Brunswick, VIC 3056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsford wins 3, Brunswick wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsfordBrunswick
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$540K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.36%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.19%
1-year house growth+1.2%estimate+0.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%1.0%
Population9,08824,896

Abbotsford vs Brunswick: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Abbotsford and $1.3M in Brunswick, so Brunswick is the cheaper entry point, with Abbotsford houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Abbotsford sits at a median of $540K against $600K in Brunswick, which makes Abbotsford the more affordable unit market and Brunswick the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.2% in Abbotsford (an estimate) and +0.1% in Brunswick (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abbotsford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Abbotsford and 1.0% in Brunswick, so landlords in Abbotsford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brunswick is the bigger suburb, with a population of 24,896 against 9,088, roughly 2.7 times the size of Abbotsford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brunswick for a lower purchase price, Abbotsford for recent price momentum, Abbotsford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison