Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Basin View

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Basin View, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 4, Basin View wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieBasin View
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%3.99%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%4.60%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate-1.2%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%2.8%
Population1,1271,583

Abercrombie vs Basin View: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $625K in Basin View, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Basin View the pricier one.

On cash flow, Basin View leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.99%, compared with 3.94% in Abercrombie, a gap of 0.05 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and -1.2% in Basin View, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, while Basin View went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Abercrombie and 2.8% in Basin View, so landlords in Abercrombie face less competition for tenants.

Basin View is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,583 against 1,127, larger than Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Basin View for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Abercrombie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison