Abercrombie vs Bondi
Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Bondi, NSW 2026
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, Bondi wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abercrombie | Bondi |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | - |
| Median unit price | $455K | $1.5M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.22% | 3.80% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | -1.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +5.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Population | 1,127 | 10,411 |
Abercrombie vs Bondi: what the numbers say
For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $1.5M in Bondi, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Bondi the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and -1.2% in Bondi, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, while Bondi went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Bondi and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Bondi face less competition for tenants.
Bondi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,411 against 1,127, roughly 9 times the size of Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Bondi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison