Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Cambewarra

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Cambewarra, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 5, Cambewarra wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieCambewarra
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%2.55%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%3.81%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+4.3%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%12.6%
Population1,127234

Abercrombie vs Cambewarra: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $620K in Cambewarra, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Cambewarra the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.55% in Cambewarra, a gap of 1.39 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +4.3% in Cambewarra, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Abercrombie and 12.6% in Cambewarra, so landlords in Abercrombie face less competition for tenants.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 234, roughly 4.8 times the size of Cambewarra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Abercrombie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison