Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Clunes

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Clunes, NSW 2480

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 2, Clunes wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieClunes
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$460K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%3.93%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%5.29%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+15.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%2.2%
Population1,127907

Abercrombie vs Clunes: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $460K in Clunes, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Clunes the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.94% in Abercrombie and 3.93% in Clunes, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +15.7% in Clunes (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Clunes, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Clunes and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Clunes face less competition for tenants.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 907, larger than Clunes; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clunes for recent price momentum, Clunes for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison