Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Dolls Point

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Dolls Point, NSW 2219

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 4, Dolls Point wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieDolls Point
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$865K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%2.19%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%3.92%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+7.0%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.8%
Population1,1271,633

Abercrombie vs Dolls Point: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $865K in Dolls Point, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Dolls Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.19% in Dolls Point, a gap of 1.75 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +7.0% in Dolls Point, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Dolls Point and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Dolls Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dolls Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,633 against 1,127, larger than Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Dolls Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison