Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Douglas Park

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Douglas Park, NSW 2569

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 1, Douglas Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieDouglas Park
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%2.24%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%-
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+9.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.9%
Population1,1271,386

Abercrombie vs Douglas Park: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.24% in Douglas Park, a gap of 1.70 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +9.7% in Douglas Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Douglas Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Douglas Park and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Douglas Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Douglas Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,386 against 1,127, larger than Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Douglas Park for recent price momentum, Douglas Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison