Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs East Wardell

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs East Wardell, NSW 2477

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, East Wardell wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieEast Wardell
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$635K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%4.19%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%4.64%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+2.6%
3-year house growth-+33.3%
Vacancy rate2.6%0.3%
Population1,127312

Abercrombie vs East Wardell: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $635K in East Wardell, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and East Wardell the pricier one.

On cash flow, East Wardell leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 3.94% in Abercrombie, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +2.6% in East Wardell, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in East Wardell and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in East Wardell face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 312, roughly 3.6 times the size of East Wardell; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: East Wardell for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, East Wardell for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison