Abercrombie vs Gables
Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Gables, NSW 2765
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 4, Gables wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abercrombie | Gables |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $860K | - |
| Median unit price | $455K | $860K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | 2.35% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.22% | 2.98% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | +14.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +60.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 6.0% |
| Population | 1,127 | 3,339 |
Abercrombie vs Gables: what the numbers say
For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $860K in Gables, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Gables the pricier one.
On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.35% in Gables, a gap of 1.59 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +14.2% in Gables, so recent momentum favours Gables, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Abercrombie and 6.0% in Gables, so landlords in Abercrombie face less competition for tenants.
Gables is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,339 against 1,127, roughly 3.0 times the size of Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Gables for recent price momentum, Abercrombie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison