Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Tuckombil

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Tuckombil, NSW 2477

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 4, Tuckombil wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieTuckombil
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$635K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%2.12%
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%4.86%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+7.7%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%0.5%
Population1,127285

Abercrombie vs Tuckombil: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $635K in Tuckombil, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Tuckombil the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abercrombie leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 2.12% in Tuckombil, a gap of 1.82 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +7.7% in Tuckombil, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Tuckombil and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Tuckombil face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abercrombie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,127 against 285, roughly 4.0 times the size of Tuckombil; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for rental income, Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Tuckombil for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Abercrombie vs Tuckombil: Suburb Comparison 2026