Skip to main content

Abercrombie vs Wollongbar

Property investment comparison - Abercrombie, NSW 2795 vs Wollongbar, NSW 2477

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abercrombie wins 3, Wollongbar wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbercrombieWollongbar
Median house price$860K-
Median unit price$455K$650K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.22%4.37%
1-year house growth+8.7%estimate+7.4%
3-year house growth--1.7%
Vacancy rate2.6%2.0%
Population1,1273,261

Abercrombie vs Wollongbar: what the numbers say

For units, Abercrombie sits at a median of $455K against $650K in Wollongbar, which makes Abercrombie the more affordable unit market and Wollongbar the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.7% in Abercrombie (an estimate) and +7.4% in Wollongbar, so recent momentum favours Abercrombie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Wollongbar and 2.6% in Abercrombie, so landlords in Wollongbar face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wollongbar is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,261 against 1,127, roughly 2.9 times the size of Abercrombie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abercrombie for recent price momentum, Wollongbar for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison