Aberdare vs Burraga
Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Burraga, NSW 2795
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 0, Burraga wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdare | Burraga |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | - |
| Median unit price | $555K | $445K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.07% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.30% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +13.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +32.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 0.7% |
| Population | 2,542 | 82 |
Aberdare vs Burraga: what the numbers say
For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $555K against $445K in Burraga, which makes Burraga the more affordable unit market and Aberdare the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Burraga and 2.0% in Aberdare, so landlords in Burraga face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 82, roughly 31 times the size of Burraga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Burraga for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison