Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Central Mangrove

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Central Mangrove, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 2, Central Mangrove wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareCentral Mangrove
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$555K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.07%2.24%
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%5.69%
1-year house growth+13.9%-
3-year house growth+32.4%-
Vacancy rate2.0%0.8%
Population2,542253

Aberdare vs Central Mangrove: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $555K against $600K in Central Mangrove, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Central Mangrove the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.07%, compared with 2.24% in Central Mangrove, a gap of 1.83 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Central Mangrove and 2.0% in Aberdare, so landlords in Central Mangrove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 253, roughly 10 times the size of Central Mangrove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Central Mangrove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison