Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Farley

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Farley, NSW 2320

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 5, Farley wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareFarley
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%4.02%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%4.17%
1-year house growth+14.7%-
3-year house growth+32.0%+30.3%
Vacancy rate1.8%3.1%
Population2,542605

Aberdare vs Farley: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $690K in Farley, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Farley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 4.02% in Farley, a gap of 0.08 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Aberdare houses are +32.0% and Farley houses +30.3%, so Aberdare has compounded faster than Farley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Aberdare and 3.1% in Farley, so landlords in Aberdare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 605, roughly 4.2 times the size of Farley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison