Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Gables

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Gables, NSW 2765

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 5, Gables wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareGables
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$860K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%2.35%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%2.98%
1-year house growth+14.7%+14.2%
3-year house growth+32.0%+60.2%
Vacancy rate1.8%6.0%
Population2,5423,339

Aberdare vs Gables: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $860K in Gables, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Gables the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.35% in Gables, a gap of 1.75 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +14.2% in Gables, so recent momentum favours Aberdare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdare houses are +32.0% and Gables houses +60.2%, so Gables has compounded faster than Aberdare over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Aberdare and 6.0% in Gables, so landlords in Aberdare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gables is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,339 against 2,542, larger than Aberdare; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for recent price momentum, Aberdare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison