Aberdare vs Kembla Grange
Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Kembla Grange, NSW 2526
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 3, Kembla Grange wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdare | Kembla Grange |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | - |
| Median unit price | $550K | $755K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | 4.06% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.43% | 4.44% |
| 1-year house growth | +14.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +32.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 3.6% |
| Population | 2,542 | 1,452 |
Aberdare vs Kembla Grange: what the numbers say
For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $755K in Kembla Grange, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Kembla Grange the pricier one.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.10% in Aberdare and 4.06% in Kembla Grange, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Aberdare and 3.6% in Kembla Grange, so landlords in Aberdare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 1,452, larger than Kembla Grange; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison