Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Luddenham

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Luddenham, NSW 2745

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 5, Luddenham wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareLuddenham
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%1.65%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%4.14%
1-year house growth+14.7%-
3-year house growth+32.0%+21.5%
Vacancy rate1.8%2.6%
Population2,5421,927

Aberdare vs Luddenham: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $745K in Luddenham, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Luddenham the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 1.65% in Luddenham, a gap of 2.45 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Aberdare houses are +32.0% and Luddenham houses +21.5%, so Aberdare has compounded faster than Luddenham over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Aberdare and 2.6% in Luddenham, so landlords in Aberdare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 1,927, larger than Luddenham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison