Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Mulbring

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Mulbring, NSW 2323

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 3, Mulbring wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareMulbring
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%1.62%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%5.58%
1-year house growth+14.7%+22.6%
3-year house growth+32.0%+29.1%
Vacancy rate1.8%5.0%
Population2,542682

Aberdare vs Mulbring: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $530K in Mulbring, which makes Mulbring the more affordable unit market and Aberdare the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 1.62% in Mulbring, a gap of 2.48 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +22.6% in Mulbring, so recent momentum favours Mulbring, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdare houses are +32.0% and Mulbring houses +29.1%, so Aberdare has compounded faster than Mulbring over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Aberdare and 5.0% in Mulbring, so landlords in Aberdare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 682, roughly 3.7 times the size of Mulbring; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Mulbring for recent price momentum, Aberdare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison