Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Tongarra

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Tongarra, NSW 2527

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 3, Tongarra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareTongarra
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%3.79%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%5.22%
1-year house growth+14.7%+9.8%estimate
3-year house growth+32.0%-
Vacancy rate1.8%0.2%
Population2,542141

Aberdare vs Tongarra: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $730K in Tongarra, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Tongarra the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 3.79% in Tongarra, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +9.8% in Tongarra (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aberdare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Tongarra and 1.8% in Aberdare, so landlords in Tongarra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 141, roughly 18 times the size of Tongarra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for recent price momentum, Tongarra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison