Skip to main content

Aberdare vs Tuckombil

Property investment comparison - Aberdare, NSW 2325 vs Tuckombil, NSW 2477

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdare wins 3, Tuckombil wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdareTuckombil
Median house price$740K-
Median unit price$550K$635K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%2.12%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%4.86%
1-year house growth+14.7%+7.7%
3-year house growth+32.0%-
Vacancy rate1.8%0.5%
Population2,542285

Aberdare vs Tuckombil: what the numbers say

For units, Aberdare sits at a median of $550K against $635K in Tuckombil, which makes Aberdare the more affordable unit market and Tuckombil the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aberdare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.12% in Tuckombil, a gap of 1.98 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.7% in Aberdare and +7.7% in Tuckombil, so recent momentum favours Aberdare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Tuckombil and 1.8% in Aberdare, so landlords in Tuckombil face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,542 against 285, roughly 9 times the size of Tuckombil; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdare for rental income, Aberdare for recent price momentum, Tuckombil for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison