Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Breamlea

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Breamlea, VIC 3227

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 2, Breamlea wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieBreamlea
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%3.68%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.63%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+7.0%
3-year house growth-+7.2%
Vacancy rate1.5%1.9%
Population3,925151

Aberfeldie vs Breamlea: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $1.3M in Breamlea, which makes Aberfeldie the more affordable unit market and Breamlea the pricier one.

On cash flow, Breamlea leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.68%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 1.70 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +7.0% in Breamlea, so recent momentum favours Breamlea, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Aberfeldie and 1.9% in Breamlea, so landlords in Aberfeldie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 151, roughly 26 times the size of Breamlea; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Breamlea for rental income, Breamlea for recent price momentum, Aberfeldie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison