Aberfeldie vs Cann River
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Cann River, VIC 3890
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 0, Cann River wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Cann River |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $415K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | 4.08% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.57% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | - |
| Population | 3,925 | 197 |
Aberfeldie vs Cann River: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $415K in Cann River, which makes Cann River the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
On cash flow, Cann River leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.08%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 2.10 percentage points.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 197, roughly 20 times the size of Cann River; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cann River for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison