Aberfeldie vs Harcourt
Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Harcourt, VIC 3453
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 1, Harcourt wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberfeldie | Harcourt |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $685K | $645K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 1.98% | 3.84% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 1.73% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Population | 3,925 | 1,038 |
Aberfeldie vs Harcourt: what the numbers say
For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $645K in Harcourt, which makes Harcourt the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.
On cash flow, Harcourt leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.84%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 1.86 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.5%.
Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 1,038, roughly 3.8 times the size of Harcourt; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Harcourt for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison