Skip to main content

Aberfeldie vs Kawarren

Property investment comparison - Aberfeldie, VIC 3040 vs Kawarren, VIC 3249

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberfeldie wins 0, Kawarren wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberfeldieKawarren
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$685K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.98%3.75%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.54%
1-year house growth-0.7%estimate+5.7%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%0.9%
Population3,925189

Aberfeldie vs Kawarren: what the numbers say

For units, Aberfeldie sits at a median of $685K against $630K in Kawarren, which makes Kawarren the more affordable unit market and Aberfeldie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kawarren leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.75%, compared with 1.98% in Aberfeldie, a gap of 1.77 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.7% in Aberfeldie (an estimate) and +5.7% in Kawarren, so recent momentum favours Kawarren, while Aberfeldie went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Kawarren and 1.5% in Aberfeldie, so landlords in Kawarren face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberfeldie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,925 against 189, roughly 21 times the size of Kawarren; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kawarren for rental income, Kawarren for recent price momentum, Kawarren for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison