Skip to main content

Adamstown vs Lisarow

Property investment comparison - Adamstown, NSW 2289 vs Lisarow, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adamstown wins 2, Lisarow wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdamstownLisarow
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$770K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.18%3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)4.35%4.60%
1-year house growth+11.7%+9.2%
3-year house growth+26.2%+15.1%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.2%
Population6,3355,299

Adamstown vs Lisarow: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Adamstown and $1.2M in Lisarow, so Lisarow is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Lisarow leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.38%, compared with 3.18% in Adamstown, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Adamstown and +9.2% in Lisarow, so recent momentum favours Adamstown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Adamstown houses are +26.2% and Lisarow houses +15.1%, so Adamstown has compounded faster than Lisarow over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Lisarow and 1.3% in Adamstown, so landlords in Lisarow face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Adamstown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,335 against 5,299, larger than Lisarow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lisarow for rental income, Lisarow for a lower purchase price, Adamstown for recent price momentum, Lisarow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison