Skip to main content

Aintree vs Breamlea

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Breamlea, VIC 3227

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Breamlea wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeBreamlea
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.68%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%2.63%
1-year house growth+1.1%+7.0%
3-year house growth-3.9%+7.2%
Vacancy rate14.5%1.9%
Population7,982151

Aintree vs Breamlea: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $1.3M in Breamlea, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Breamlea the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.68% in Breamlea, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +7.0% in Breamlea, so recent momentum favours Breamlea, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Breamlea houses +7.2%, so Breamlea has compounded faster than Aintree over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Breamlea and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Breamlea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 151, roughly 53 times the size of Breamlea; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Breamlea for recent price momentum, Breamlea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison