Aintree vs Cambrian Hill
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Cambrian Hill, VIC 3352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Cambrian Hill wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Cambrian Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $330K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 4.59% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 1.7% |
| Population | 7,982 | 292 |
Aintree vs Cambrian Hill: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $330K in Cambrian Hill, which makes Cambrian Hill the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Cambrian Hill and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Cambrian Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 292, roughly 27 times the size of Cambrian Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Cambrian Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison