Aintree vs Deans Marsh
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Deans Marsh, VIC 3235
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Deans Marsh wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Deans Marsh |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $875K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 3.33% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 4.3% |
| Population | 7,982 | 368 |
Aintree vs Deans Marsh: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $875K in Deans Marsh, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Deans Marsh the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.33% in Deans Marsh, a gap of 0.65 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 4.3% in Deans Marsh and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Deans Marsh face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 368, roughly 22 times the size of Deans Marsh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Deans Marsh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison