Skip to main content

Aintree vs Heathcote South

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Heathcote South, VIC 3523

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Heathcote South wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeHeathcote South
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$430K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%2.93%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%4.84%
1-year house growth+1.1%-
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%2.1%
Population7,98222

Aintree vs Heathcote South: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $430K in Heathcote South, which makes Heathcote South the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.93% in Heathcote South, a gap of 1.05 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Heathcote South and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Heathcote South face less competition for tenants.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 22, roughly 363 times the size of Heathcote South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Heathcote South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison