Skip to main content

Aintree vs Kawarren

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Kawarren, VIC 3249

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Kawarren wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeKawarren
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.75%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%5.54%
1-year house growth+1.1%+5.7%
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%0.9%
Population7,982189

Aintree vs Kawarren: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $630K in Kawarren, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Kawarren the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.75% in Kawarren, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +5.7% in Kawarren, so recent momentum favours Kawarren, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Kawarren and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Kawarren face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 189, roughly 42 times the size of Kawarren; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Kawarren for recent price momentum, Kawarren for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison