Aintree vs Mandurang
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Mandurang, VIC 3551
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Mandurang wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Mandurang |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $515K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 2.07% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 5.81% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | +4.3% |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 5.8% |
| Population | 7,982 | 753 |
Aintree vs Mandurang: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $515K in Mandurang, which makes Mandurang the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.07% in Mandurang, a gap of 1.91 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +4.3% in Mandurang, so recent momentum favours Mandurang, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 5.8% in Mandurang and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Mandurang face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 753, roughly 11 times the size of Mandurang; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Mandurang for recent price momentum, Mandurang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison