Aintree vs Moggs Creek
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Moggs Creek, VIC 3231
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Moggs Creek wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Moggs Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $1.1M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 2.03% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.74% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 7.6% |
| Population | 7,982 | 120 |
Aintree vs Moggs Creek: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $1.1M in Moggs Creek, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Moggs Creek the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.03% in Moggs Creek, a gap of 1.95 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 7.6% in Moggs Creek and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Moggs Creek face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 120, roughly 67 times the size of Moggs Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Moggs Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison