Skip to main content

Aintree vs Sedgwick

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Sedgwick, VIC 3551

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Sedgwick wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeSedgwick
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.39%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%4.14%
1-year house growth+1.1%+8.3%
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%1.7%
Population7,982614

Aintree vs Sedgwick: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $585K in Sedgwick, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Sedgwick the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.39% in Sedgwick, a gap of 0.59 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +8.3% in Sedgwick, so recent momentum favours Sedgwick, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Sedgwick and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Sedgwick face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 614, roughly 13 times the size of Sedgwick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Sedgwick for recent price momentum, Sedgwick for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison