Aintree vs Smiths Gully
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Smiths Gully, VIC 3760
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Smiths Gully wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Smiths Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $1.2M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.16% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 2.1% |
| Population | 7,982 | 356 |
Aintree vs Smiths Gully: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $1.2M in Smiths Gully, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Smiths Gully the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Smiths Gully and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Smiths Gully face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 356, roughly 22 times the size of Smiths Gully; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Smiths Gully for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison