Aireys Inlet vs Lalbert
Property investment comparison - Aireys Inlet, VIC 3231 vs Lalbert, VIC 3542
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aireys Inlet wins 0, Lalbert wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aireys Inlet | Lalbert |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | - |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.34% | 8.31% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.77% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -5.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | - |
| Population | 979 | 138 |
Aireys Inlet vs Lalbert: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Lalbert leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 8.31%, compared with 2.34% in Aireys Inlet, a gap of 5.97 percentage points.
Aireys Inlet is the bigger suburb, with a population of 979 against 138, roughly 7 times the size of Lalbert; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lalbert for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison