Aireys Inlet vs Quambatook
Property investment comparison - Aireys Inlet, VIC 3231 vs Quambatook, VIC 3540
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aireys Inlet wins 0, Quambatook wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aireys Inlet | Quambatook |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | - |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.34% | 5.99% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.77% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -5.9%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | - |
| Population | 979 | 229 |
Aireys Inlet vs Quambatook: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Quambatook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.99%, compared with 2.34% in Aireys Inlet, a gap of 3.65 percentage points.
Aireys Inlet is the bigger suburb, with a population of 979 against 229, roughly 4.3 times the size of Quambatook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Quambatook for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison