Skip to main content

Alderley vs Ashmore

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Ashmore, QLD 4214

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 0, Ashmore wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyAshmore
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$770K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%5.25%
1-year house growth+12.7%+14.3%
3-year house growth+35.9%+39.5%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.5%
Population6,74812,415

Alderley vs Ashmore: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $770K in Ashmore, which makes Ashmore the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +14.3% in Ashmore, so recent momentum favours Ashmore, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Ashmore houses +39.5%, so Ashmore has compounded faster than Alderley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Ashmore and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Ashmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ashmore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,415 against 6,748, larger than Alderley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ashmore for recent price momentum, Ashmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison