Skip to main content

Alderley vs Clarendon

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Clarendon, QLD 4311

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 0, Clarendon wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyClarendon
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%4.14%
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%-
1-year house growth+12.7%+15.0%
3-year house growth+35.9%+57.8%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.5%
Population6,748232

Alderley vs Clarendon: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Clarendon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.14%, compared with 2.46% in Alderley, a gap of 1.68 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +15.0% in Clarendon, so recent momentum favours Clarendon, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Clarendon houses +57.8%, so Clarendon has compounded faster than Alderley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Clarendon and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Clarendon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 232, roughly 29 times the size of Clarendon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clarendon for rental income, Clarendon for recent price momentum, Clarendon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison