Skip to main content

Alderley vs Cluden

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Cluden, QLD 4811

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 1, Cluden wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyCluden
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$715K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%2.75%
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%3.97%
1-year house growth+12.7%+15.0%
3-year house growth+35.9%+67.1%
Vacancy rate1.8%2.2%
Population6,748413

Alderley vs Cluden: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $715K in Cluden, which makes Cluden the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Cluden leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.75%, compared with 2.46% in Alderley, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +15.0% in Cluden, so recent momentum favours Cluden, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Cluden houses +67.1%, so Cluden has compounded faster than Alderley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Alderley and 2.2% in Cluden, so landlords in Alderley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 413, roughly 16 times the size of Cluden; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Cluden for rental income, Cluden for recent price momentum, Alderley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison