Skip to main content

Alderley vs Federal

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Federal, QLD 4568

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 4, Federal wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyFederal
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%3.02%
1-year house growth+12.7%+11.4%
3-year house growth+35.9%+27.9%
Vacancy rate1.8%3.1%
Population6,748365

Alderley vs Federal: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $555K in Federal, which makes Federal the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +11.4% in Federal, so recent momentum favours Alderley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Federal houses +27.9%, so Alderley has compounded faster than Federal over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Alderley and 3.1% in Federal, so landlords in Alderley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 365, roughly 18 times the size of Federal; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alderley for recent price momentum, Alderley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison