Skip to main content

Alderley vs Guanaba

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Guanaba, QLD 4210

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 4, Guanaba wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyGuanaba
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%2.06%
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%3.05%
1-year house growth+12.7%+17.3%estimate
3-year house growth+35.9%-
Vacancy rate1.8%3.4%
Population6,748852

Alderley vs Guanaba: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $1.2M in Guanaba, which makes Alderley the more affordable unit market and Guanaba the pricier one.

On cash flow, Alderley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 2.06% in Guanaba, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +17.3% in Guanaba (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Guanaba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Alderley and 3.4% in Guanaba, so landlords in Alderley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 852, roughly 8 times the size of Guanaba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alderley for rental income, Guanaba for recent price momentum, Alderley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Alderley vs Guanaba: Property Investment Comparison (2026)