Skip to main content

Alderley vs Hampden

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Hampden, QLD 4741

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 0, Hampden wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyHampden
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$860K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.45%3.71%
Gross rental yield (units)3.69%-
1-year house growth+9.9%+12.4%
3-year house growth+36.8%+38.1%
Vacancy rate2.0%0.9%
Population6,748598

Alderley vs Hampden: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Hampden leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.71%, compared with 2.45% in Alderley, a gap of 1.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.9% in Alderley and +12.4% in Hampden, so recent momentum favours Hampden, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +36.8% and Hampden houses +38.1%, so Hampden has compounded faster than Alderley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Hampden and 2.0% in Alderley, so landlords in Hampden face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 598, roughly 11 times the size of Hampden; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hampden for rental income, Hampden for recent price momentum, Hampden for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison