Skip to main content

Alderley vs Warana

Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Warana, QLD 4575

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 1, Warana wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAlderleyWarana
Median house price$1.7M-
Median unit price$855K$740K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.71%5.42%
1-year house growth+12.7%+11.2%
3-year house growth+35.9%+51.2%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.4%
Population6,7483,831

Alderley vs Warana: what the numbers say

For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $740K in Warana, which makes Warana the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Alderley and +11.2% in Warana, so recent momentum favours Alderley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Alderley houses are +35.9% and Warana houses +51.2%, so Warana has compounded faster than Alderley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Warana and 1.8% in Alderley, so landlords in Warana face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 3,831, larger than Warana; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Alderley for recent price momentum, Warana for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison