Alderley vs Woongarra
Property investment comparison - Alderley, QLD 4051 vs Woongarra, QLD 4670
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Alderley wins 2, Woongarra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Alderley | Woongarra |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.7M | - |
| Median unit price | $855K | $295K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.46% | 1.82% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.71% | 9.18% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +35.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Population | 6,748 | 585 |
Alderley vs Woongarra: what the numbers say
For units, Alderley sits at a median of $855K against $295K in Woongarra, which makes Woongarra the more affordable unit market and Alderley the pricier one.
On cash flow, Alderley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.46%, compared with 1.82% in Woongarra, a gap of 0.64 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.8%.
Alderley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,748 against 585, roughly 12 times the size of Woongarra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Alderley for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison